Myofascial trigger point therapy benefit for medical diseases information and treatment modalities
Myofascial trigger point therapy is a type of alternative medicine bodywork which tries to release muscular tension by applying pressure to trigger points, areas of the muscle which hold pain and tension. This type of bodywork is also sometimes referred to as myofascial release or trigger point therapy. Myofascial trigger point therapy and acupuncture have many similar trigger points.
History of myofascial trigger point therapy
The principles of myofascial trigger point therapy began to take shape in the
West in the 1800s, and evolved in the 20th century into its current form. It is
based on the concept that the muscles and connective tissue covering them -- the
fascia -- have specific hyper-irritable areas, or trigger points, that produce
pain in the immediate area or elsewhere in the body (called referred pain).
Physical therapists, chiropractors and other practitioners use various methods
to relieve pain at these trigger points, including massage, deep pressure,
electrical stimulation and stretching. Acupuncture and myofascial trigger point
therapy focus on stimulating specific points on the body to treat pain. There
are 361 classical acupuncture points, and 255 trigger points in myofascial pain
therapy. The majority of these trigger points correspond anatomically with
acupuncture points. In the treatment of pain disorders, acupuncture and
myofascial techniques are quite similar. Journal of Alternative and
Complementary Medicine, 2008.
Discrepancy between prevalence and perceived
effectiveness of treatment methods in myofascial pain syndrome: Results of a
cross-sectional, nationwide survey.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010; Fleckenstein J, Ruger LJ,
Lehmeyer L, Freiberg F, Lang PM, Irnich D.
Myofascial pain is a common dysfunction with a lifetime prevalence affecting
up to 85% of the general population. Current guidelines for the management of
myofascial pain are not available. In this study we investigated how physicians
on the basis of prescription behaviour evaluate the effectiveness of treatment
options in their management of myofascial pain. We conducted a cross-sectional,
nationwide survey with a standardized questionnaire among 332 physicians
experienced in treating patients with myofascial pain. Recruitment of physicians
took place at three German meetings of pain therapists, rheumatologists and
orthopaedists, respectively. Physicians estimated the prevalence of myofascial
pain amongst patients in their practices, stated what treatments they used
routinely and then rated the perceived treatment effectiveness on a six-point
scale (with 1 being excellent). Data are expressed as mean +/- standard
deviation. The estimated overall prevalence of active myofascial trigger points
is 46%. Frequently prescribed treatments are analgesics, mainly metamizol/paracetamol
(91%), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs/coxibs (87%) or weak opioids (81%),
and physical therapies, mainly manual therapy (81%), TENS (72%) or acupuncture
(60%). Overall effectiveness ratings for analgesics and physical therapies were
moderate. Effectiveness ratings of the various treatment options between
specialities were widely variant. 54.3% of all physicians characterized the
available treatment options as insufficient. Myofascial pain was estimated a
prevalent condition. Despite a variety of commonly prescribed treatments, the
moderate effectiveness ratings and the frequent characterizations of the
available treatments as insufficient suggest an urgent need for clinical
research to establish evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of myofascial
pain syndrome.